Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMJ. 1996 Nov 30;313(7069):1390-3.

Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability.

Author information

  • 1Clinical Ethics Project, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals.

Abstract

The results of recent empirical investigations in research synthesis imply that research ethics committees are behaving unethically by endorsing new research which is unnecessary and by acquiescing in biased under-reporting of research which they have approved. The performance and accountability of research ethics committees would be improved if they required those proposing research to present systematic reviews of relevant previous research in support of their applications; to summarise the results of these reviews in the information prepared for potential participants; to register new controlled trials at inception; and to ensure that the results of these trials are made publicly available within a reasonable period of time after completion of data collection.

PMID:
8956711
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2352884
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk