Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1996 Apr;24(2):151-68.

Scales, diagnoses, and child psychopathology: II. Comparing the CBCL and the DISC against external validators.

Author information

  • 1Child & Adolescent Disorders Research Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Maryland 20857, USA.

Abstract

Using a multimethod multistage screening procedure, the authors interviewed 201 parents and their children with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1). In addition, parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and other survey measures, while their children completed self-report scales. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were done to determine optimal cutpoints on the CBCL, referenced to DISC diagnostic "caseness." DISC diagnoses, DISC "stem" symptoms, CBCL scores, and CBCL ROC-outpoints were compared against "external validators," in order to determine the comparative advantages of each approach for assessing child psychopathology. Overall findings suggest that the controversies about "best" assessment strategies may be artificial: When both assessment approaches are compared using similar methods, they are reasonably comparable. However, highly specific diagnostic categories may show fewer relationships with external validators and may therefore need more systematic validational studies.

PMID:
8743242
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk