Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
CMAJ. 1996 Jun 15;154(12):1837-43.

Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 2. Ten potential pitfalls in determining the clinical significance of benefits.

Author information

  • Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC.

Abstract

A preventive program is only of value if it has proven benefits that outweigh any adverse consequences; unfortunately, determination of the clinical significance of reported benefits is not always easy. The first article of this series discussed the confusion caused by reporting results in terms of relative rates. In this article, 10 other pitfalls that may lead to misunderstanding of the degree of benefits are reviewed. These pitfalls are: the type of outcome chosen (surrogate v. clinically significant), the risk level in the population screened, the interval between the intervention and the benefit, the duration of intervention required to achieve the benefit, the overshadowing of one benefit by another, the application of a benefit for one variant of a disease to another variant, lower benefits in community settings than in clinical trials, publication bias, preferential citation of studies showing beneficial effects and "false-negative" results of studies. These pitfalls are illustrated through examples from the current medical literature.

PMID:
8653643
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC1487736
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk