My NCBISign In

Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):678-83.

    Traditional epidemiology, modern epidemiology, and public health.

    Pearce N.

    Wellington School of Medicine, New Zealand.

    Comment in:

    There have been significant developments in epidemiologic methodology during the past century, including changes in basic concepts, methods of data analysis, and methods of exposure measurement. However, the rise of modern epidemiology has been a mixed blessing, and the new paradigm has major shortcomings, both in public health and in scientific terms. The changes in the paradigm have not been neutral but have rather helped change--and have reflected changes in--the way in which epidemiologists think about health and disease. The key issue has been the shift in the level of analysis from the population to the individual. Epidemiology has largely ceased to function as part of a multidisciplinary approach to understanding the causation of disease in populations and has become a set of generic methods for measuring associations of exposure and disease in individuals. This reductionist approach focuses on the individual, blames the victim, and produces interventions that can be harmful. We seem to be using more and more advanced technology to study more and more trivial issues, while the major causes of disease are ignored. Epidemiology must reintegrate itself into public health and must rediscover the population perspective.

    PMID: 8629719 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    PMCID: PMC1380476

    Supplemental Content

    Click here to read Click here to read
    Write to the Help Desk