Sealing ability of three materials used to repair lateral root perforations

J Endod. 1993 Feb;19(2):59-62. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81195-7.

Abstract

Thirty-five extracted single-rooted human teeth were decoronalized, root filled with AH-26 and gutta-percha, and perforated at the apical one third level. Repairs of the lateral perforations were carried out with three materials: amalgam plus cavity varnish, EBA cement, and silver glass-ionomer cement. Negative controls were not perforated and positive controls had unrepaired perforations. The roots were then implanted subcutaneously in rats for 5 days to place the materials in a surgical environment. Following retrieval, the roots were placed in a solution containing 20 microCi/ml of calcium-45 for 7 days to measure microleakage. They were rinsed, sectioned, and autoradiographs of the repaired perforations were made. The autoradiographs were projected onto a screen and the extent of penetration of the radioisotope measured. Statistical analysis showed that the EBA cement group exhibited significantly less leakage than the silver glass-ionomer cement group (p < 0.05). No differences were found between the other groups. It was concluded that EBA cement provides a superior seal in lateral root perforations to silver glass-ionomer cement while amalgam was intermediate between the two.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum Oxide
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Cermet Cements
  • Dental Amalgam*
  • Dental Cements*
  • Dental Leakage*
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent / methods*
  • Humans
  • Radionuclide Imaging
  • Tooth Root / diagnostic imaging
  • Tooth Root / injuries*

Substances

  • Cermet Cements
  • Dental Cements
  • EBA alumina cement
  • Dental Amalgam
  • Aluminum Oxide