Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993 Jul;13(4):656-67.

Measurement of benzodiazepine receptor number and affinity in humans using tracer kinetic modeling, positron emission tomography, and [11C]flumazenil.

Author information

  • 1Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.

Abstract

Kinetic methods were used to obtain regional estimates of benzodiazepine receptor concentration (Bmax) and equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) from high and low specific activity (SA) [11C]flumazenil ([11C] Ro 15-1788) positron emission tomography studies of five normal volunteers. The high and low SA data were simultaneously fit to linear and nonlinear three-compartment models, respectively. An additional inhibition study (pretreatment with 0.15 mg/kg of flumazenil) was performed on one of the volunteers, which resulted in an average gray matter K1/k2 estimate of 0.68 +/- 0.08 ml/ml (linear three-compartment model, nine brain regions). The free fraction of flumazenil in plasma (f1) was determined for each study (high SA f1: 0.50 +/- 0.03; low SA f1: 0.48 +/- 0.05). The free fraction in brain (f2) was calculated using the inhibition K1/k2 ratio and each volunteer's mean f1 value (f2 across volunteers = 0.72 +/- 0.03 ml/ml). Three methods (Methods I-III) were examined. Method I determined five kinetic parameters simultaneously [K1, k2, k3 (= konf2Bmax), k4, and konf2/SA] with no priori constraints. An average kon value of 0.030 +/- 0.003 nM-1 min-1 was estimated for receptor-rich regions using Method I. In Methods II and III, the konf2/SA parameter was specifically constrained using the Method I value of kon and the volunteer's values of f2 and low SA (Ci/mumol). Four parameters were determined simultaneously using Method II. In Method III, K1/k2 was fixed to the inhibition value and only three parameters were estimated. Method I provided the most variable results and convergence problems for regions with low receptor binding. Method II provided results that were less variable but very similar to the Method I results, without convergence problems. However, the K1/k2 ratios obtained by Method II ranged from 1.07 in the occipital cortex to 0.61 in the thalamus. Fixing the K1/k2 ratio in Method III provided a method that was physiologically consistent with the fixed value of f2 and resulted in parameters with considerably lower variability. The average Bmax values obtained using Method III were 100 +/- 25 nM in the occipital cortex, 64 +/- 18 nM in the cerebellum, and 38 +/- 5.5 nM in the thalamus; the average Kd was 8.9 +/- 1.0 nM (five brain regions).

PMID:
8391018
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk