Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychol Bull. 1993 Nov;114(3):435-48.

Human contingency judgments: rule based or associative?

Author information

  • Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

The study of the mechanism that detects the contingency between events, in both humans and nonhuman animals, is a matter of considerable research activity. Two broad categories of explanations of the acquisition of contingency information have received extensive evaluation: rule-based models and associative models. This article assess the two categories of models for human contingency judgments. The data reveal systematic departures in contingency judgments from the predictions of rule-based models. Recent studies indicate that a contiguity model of Pavlovian conditioning is a useful heuristic for conceptualizing human contingency judgments.

PMID:
8272465
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk