Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Mol Biol. 1994 Jun 3;239(2):315-31.

Amino/aromatic interactions in proteins: is the evidence stacked against hydrogen bonding?

Author information

  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London, U.K.

Abstract

We investigate the suggestion that aromatic rings can act as hydrogen-bond acceptors in proteins, by an analysis of 55 non-homologous high-resolution protein chain structures. Approximately 10% of interactions between sp2 hybridized nitrogen atoms, from either side-chains or main-chains, and phenylalanine or tyrosine rings have the nitrogen atom positioned above the ring. In these instances, however, the sp2 nitrogen atoms tend to form stacked interactions with the aromatic rings, these geometries outnumbering amino/aromatic hydrogen bonds by around 2.5:1. The statistically expected distribution, in contrast, would have only a few stacked structures and many more with larger interplanar angles, corresponding to amino/aromatic hydrogen bonds. Thus, although we do find some of these unconventional hydrogen bonds, they are clearly disfavoured relative to stacked geometries. In stacked geometries, the nitrogen-bearing groups are observed to fulfil their hydrogen-bonding potential by forming conventional, energetically stronger, hydrogen bonds with other groups in protein or solvent. This may explain the favourability of stacking. Thus, although ab initio calculations of the gas phase interaction energies for three model systems generally favour the amino/aromatic hydrogen-bonded over the stacked geometries, the differences are small enough to be outweighed easily by the additional conventional hydrogen bonding in stacked structures.

PMID:
8196060
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk