Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...
1: Lancet. 1994 May 7;343(8906):1127-30.Click here to read Links
Comment in:
Lancet. 1994 Jul 9;344(8915):136-7; author reply 137-8.
Lancet. 1994 Jul 9;344(8915):137; author reply 137-8.
Lancet. 1994 Jul 9;344(8915):137; author reply 137-8.

A population study of food intolerance.

Amersham Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Bucks, UK.

We did a population study to identify the prevalence of reactions to eight foods commonly perceived to cause sensitivity in the UK. A cross-sectional survey of 7500 households in the Wycombe Health Authority area and the same number of randomly-selected households nationwide was followed up by interviews of positive respondents from the Wycombe Health Authority area. Those who agreed entered a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge study to confirm food intolerance. 20.4% of the nationwide sample and 19.9% of the High Wycombe sample complained of food intolerance. Of the 93 subjects who entered the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, 19.4% (95% confidence interval 11.4%-27.4%) had a positive reaction. The estimated prevalence of reactions to the eight foods tested in the population varied from 1.4% to 1.8% according to the definition used. Women perceived food intolerance more frequently and showed a higher rate of positive results to food challenge. There is a discrepancy between perception of food intolerance and the results of the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges. The consequences of mistaken perception of food intolerance may be considerable in financial, nutritional, and health terms.

PMID: 7910231 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]