Health care reform strategies proposed by provincial governments include decentralized funding and increased public participation in decision making. These proposals do not give details as to the public participation process, and a number of questions have been raised by the experience of some communities. Which citizens should form the decision-making group? What information do they need? What kinds of decisions should they make? What level of participation should they have? The results of a survey by Abelson and associates (see pages 403 to 412 of this issue) challenge the assumption that "communities" are willing to participate in health-care and social-service decision making. Willingness varied according to the composition of the groups polled, and participants' support for traditional decision makers increased after the complexities of the decision-making process were discussed. However, whereas their study measured willingness to participate at one point in time only, experience gained from Ontario's Better Beginnings, Better Futures project indicates that, given sufficient time, "ordinary" citizens are willing and can acquire the skills needed to decide how resources should be allocated for social services.