Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1982;13(4):193-205.

    Diagnostic and therapeutic viewpoints on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. 10-Year follow-up of a conization material.

    Abstract

    In 429 women with the diagnosis of cancer in situ (CIS), we found, during a follow-up time of 10 years, a relapse frequency of 5.3%; conization was the primary treatment in 414 cases, in 13 cases hysterectomy and radiotherapy in 2 cases. We found that the mean age was significantly higher (p less than 0.01) when the primary CIS lesion was localized in the cervix (36.8 +/- 10.5) compared to localization only on the portio (31.3 +/- 8.7). The risk of relapse was significantly higher (p less than 0.05) in patients where the primary cone had the lesion localized in the cervix compared to the patients where the primary cone had the lesion localized only to the portio. We found that the localization of PAD relapses appearing later compared to a high degree (about 65%) with the localization of the primary CIS lesion. Vaginal relapse was, generally speaking, twice as common when the primary CIS lesion was localized in the cervix compared to when it was localized on the portio alone. Alternative treatment methods to the conization operation are discussed and an increased individualization of CIS treatment is emphasized particularly with consideration to age and the localization of the CIS lesion.

    PMID:
    7095598
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk