-
Comparison of techniques for measuring baroreflex sensitivity in man.
Because discrepancies about baroreflex sensitivity in essential hypertension may have resulted from the use of different measurement techniques, we assessed the extent to which the results of different techniques agree in the same subjects. The eight techniques studied were the change in RR interval per unit change in systolic pressure during the Valsalva maneuver, upon release of the Valsalva maneuver, after injection of phenylephrine and after injection of nitroglycerin; the changes in RR interval and in systolic pressure per mm Hg externally applied neck suction; and the changes in RR interval and systolic pressure per mm Hg externally applied neck pressure. The average intercorrelation among these measures in 30 subjects was statistically significant (r = 0.36, p less than 0.01), but suggests that variance in one measure accounted for an average of about 13% of the variance in other measures. Standard deviations among subjects were often as large as the mean, indicating important interindividual variability as well. These findings demonstrate that baroreflex sensitivity varies widely among subjects and that different techniques for measuring baroreflex sensitivity probably measure different aspects of baroreflex function.
PMID: 7094250 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
Cited by 3 PubMed Central articles
-
Supine low-frequency power of heart rate variability reflects baroreflex function, not cardiac sympathetic innervation.
Moak JP, Goldstein DS, Eldadah BA, Saleem A, Holmes C, Pechnik S, Sharabi Y.
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Dec; 4(12):1523-9. Epub 2007 Jul 18.
[Heart Rhythm. 2007]
-
ReviewDenervation of carotid baro- and chemoreceptors in humans.
Timmers HJ, Wieling W, Karemaker JM, Lenders JW.
J Physiol. 2003 Nov 15; 553(Pt 1):3-11. Epub 2003 Oct 3.
[J Physiol. 2003]
-
The effect of acute and chronic captopril therapy on baroreflex function in man.
Kondowe GB, Deering AH, Riddell JG, Johnston GD, Harron DW.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Mar; 25(3):315-21.
[Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988]