Early opposition to obstetric anaesthesia

Anaesthesia. 1980 Sep;35(9):896-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1980.tb03951.x.

Abstract

Some of the arguments used to oppose the introduction of inhalation anaesthesia--especially in obstetrics--are considered. These arguments were mainly based upon a desire to retain the sensation of pain, either as a factor necessary for survival or as a diagnostic aid: moral arguments were also adduced but religious opposition is no more than a myth of historiography. The opposition to anaesthesia lasted for less than 15 years and is seen as essentially a reflection of contemporary views on the role of pain.

Publication types

  • Historical Article

MeSH terms

  • Anesthesia, Inhalation / history
  • Anesthesia, Obstetrical / history*
  • Chloroform
  • Ether
  • Female
  • History, 19th Century
  • History, 20th Century
  • Humans
  • Morals
  • Pain / physiopathology
  • Pregnancy
  • Religion
  • United Kingdom

Substances

  • Ether
  • Chloroform