A systematic approach to the evaluation and management of breast masses

Cancer. 1983 Jun 15;51(12 Suppl):2535-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830615)51:12+<2535::aid-cncr2820511326>3.0.co;2-c.

Abstract

Between 1975 and 1980, 392 patients with a palpable mass or masses were referred for breast evaluation, including risk factor assessment, physical examination, and selective utilization of aspiration cytology and mammography. Three-hundred and thirty-one (85%) were biopsied, with a benign diagnosis in 65% of the patients and cancer in 35%. The 61 patients (15%) who were not biopsied consisted of 32 patients in whom the mass disappeared on follow-up examination, 20 with stabilization on long-term follow-up, and nine with decreased mass size. Most breast masses must be biopsied, but a few can be followed and biopsy avoided. However, a decision not to biopsy requires more precise clinical judgement and experience than a decision to proceed with biopsy. Absolute indications for breast biopsy include a clinically suspicious mass, a mammogram considered malignant or suspicious, aspiration cytologic findings reported as malignant or suspicious, and a persisting, dominant mass, even if clinically benign.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Biopsy, Needle
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology
  • Breast Neoplasms / therapy
  • Decision Making
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • False Negative Reactions
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Mammography
  • Methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Palpation
  • Physical Examination*