Operative ultrasonography and operative radiographic cholangiography were compared for diagnostic effectiveness with regard to their ability to screen the common bile duct for the presence of calculi. We performed real-time B-mode ultrasonography and cholangiography using two injections of contrast material. In 350 patients, 349 ultrasonic and 285 cholangiographic examinations were performed with technically satisfactory results. The sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, and predictability of a negative test were at a high and comparable level for the two diagnostic procedures. However, the predictability of a positive test for ultrasonography of 91.8% was significantly greater (P less than 0.02) than the predictability of 73.2% for cholangiography. Since predictability of a positive test is based on common duct exploration rather than presumptive evidence of a clinical course, this test may be more valid than the other measures to determine diagnostic effectiveness. The advantages of ultrasonography, which are superior accuracy, favorable image qualities, reduced invasiveness, increased safety, avoidance of contrast material, and lower cost, were contrasted with the problems of ultrasonography, which included a slow learning curve for performance and interpretation of the technique and the limited availability of dedicated ultrasound equipment for surgical operations. We concluded that the advantages outweighed the problems and that operative ultrasonography of the common duct warrants wider application in clinical surgery.