Do infants see emotional expressions in static faces?

Child Dev. 1985 Dec;56(6):1552-60.

Abstract

To determine whether young infants discriminate photographs of different emotions on an affect-relevant basis or on the basis of isolated features unrelated to emotion, groups of 17-, 23-, and 29-week-olds were habituated to slides of 8 women posing either Toothy Angry, Nontoothy Angry, or Nontoothy Smiling facial expressions and were then shown 2 new women in the familiarized expression and in a novel Toothy Smiling expression. At all 3 ages, recovery to the novel Toothy Smiling faces occurred only after habituation to Nontoothy faces (whether smiling or angry), not after habituation to Toothy Angry faces, indicating that infants had been responsive to nonspecific features of the photographs (presence or absence of bared teeth) rather than to affectively relevant configurations of features. In a second experiment, 2 older age groups (35 and 41 weeks) also proved to be insensitive to affect-related aspects of still faces, though more so for angry than for happy expressions. It is suggested that the young infant's difficulty in extracting emotional information from static stimuli may be attributable to the absence of the critical invariants (dynamic, multimodally specified) that characterize naturalistic expressions of emotion.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Anger
  • Arousal
  • Discrimination Learning
  • Emotions*
  • Facial Expression*
  • Female
  • Form Perception*
  • Habituation, Psychophysiologic
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual*
  • Smiling