Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with traditional endocrine therapy (ET) have become the recommended first-line therapy for HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the relationship between HER2-low expression and clinical outcomes in HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients receiving ET with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Methods: Between April 2016 and November 2019, 233 women with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC who received ET with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors were enrolled into the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards models.
Results: HER2-low and HER2-zero subgroups in the CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET cohort showed no significant difference in the median PFS (10.9 vs. 8.0 months; hazard ratio: 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-1. 30; p = 0.65), while HER2-low subgroup showed a significantly shorter median PFS compared to the HER2-zero subgroup in the ET alone cohort (5.6 vs. 17.0 months; hazard ratio: 2.82; 95% CI: 1.34-5.93; p = 0.0044). Moreover, the objective response rate was significantly lower in the HER2-low subgroup than the HER2-zero subgroup in the ET alone cohort (10.5% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.047). Lastly, no significant difference was observed in the overall survival between the HER2-low and HER2-zero subgroups in both cohorts.
Conclusion: This study suggested that HER2-low expression may predict the efficacy of ET but not that of CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET in HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients. The results of this study highlight the importance of integrating HER2 status in tailoring personalized treatment strategies for HR-positive MBC.
Keywords: CDK4/6 inhibitors; HER2‐low; endocrine therapy; metastatic breast cancer; prospective analysis.
© 2024 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.