The evolution of vaccine hesitancy through the COVID-19 pandemic: A semi-structured interview study on booster and bivalent doses

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2316417. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2316417. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

Abstract

We sought in-depth understanding on the evolution of factors influencing COVID-19 booster dose and bivalent vaccine hesitancy in a longitudinal semi-structured interview-based qualitative study. Serial interviews were conducted between July 25th and September 1st, 2022 (Phase I: univalent booster dose availability), and between November 21st, 2022 and January 11th, 2023 (Phase II: bivalent vaccine availability). Adults (≥18 years) in Canada who had received an initial primary series and had not received a COVID-19 booster dose were eligible for Phase I, and subsequently invited to participate in Phase II. Twenty-two of twenty-three (96%) participants completed interviews for both phases (45 interviews). Nearly half of participants identified as a woman (n = 11), the median age was 37 years (interquartile range: 32-48), and most participants were employed full-time (n = 12); no participant reported needing to vaccinate (with a primary series) for their workplace. No participant reported having received a COVID-19 booster dose at the time of their interview in Phase II. Three themes relating to the development of hesitancy toward continued vaccination against COVID-19 were identified: 1) effectiveness (frequency concerns; infection despite vaccination); 2) necessity (less threatening, low urgency, alternate protective measures); and 3) information (need for data, contradiction and confusion, lack of trust, decreased motivation). The data from interviews with individuals who had not received a COVID-19 booster dose or bivalent vaccine despite having received a primary series of COVID-19 vaccines highlights actionable targets to address vaccine hesitancy and improve public health literacy.

Keywords: COVID-19; Vaccine hesitancy; bivalent; booster; interviews; public.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • COVID-19* / prevention & control
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Pandemics
  • Qualitative Research
  • Vaccination Hesitancy
  • Vaccines, Combined

Substances

  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Vaccines, Combined

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Operating Grant: Emerging COVID-19 Research Gaps & Priorities – Confidence in science [#177722]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.