Murine anti-HLA monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) to monomorphic and polymorphic epitopes were compared for their reactivity in humans vs. pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina). Five MoAbs to monomorphic class I epitopes in humans displayed distinct patterns in macaques: two were unreactive, one reacted with 93% of animals tested, another with 17%, and one with only 8% of animals tested. Thus, epitopes that are monomorphic in one species can be highly polymorphic in another. Most of the 23 MoAbs (91%) against polymorphic epitopes in humans also detected polymorphisms in macaques. The epitopes detected by MoAbs could be divided roughly into two groups: epitopes that were expressed at the same frequency in both species, i.e., monomorphic, public, or private epitopes in both species, or epitopes that had quite different expression in the two species, e.g., a "public" epitope in one species expressed as a "private" epitope in the other. The genes encoding some of these polymorphisms were shown to segregate in families and thus some anti-HLA MoAbs are useful typing reagents for macaques. Two MoAbs thought to detect the same specificity in humans were found to react in macaques with different animals. Thus, reactivity patterns of anti-HLA class I MoAbs in primate populations enabled MoAbs to closely associated epitopes to be distinguished.