Introduction: Controversy exists around which distal tibial fractures are pilon fractures. We evaluated views to define a pilon fracture and support the development of standards of care.
Methods: Views regarding the characteristics of a pilon fracture and acute soft tissue management were determined through a questionnaire. This was trialled, approved by the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society and distributed to its members. This was also distributed nationally as part of the ENFORCE study.
Results: In total, 282 consultants from 27 units responded, of whom 24% (69/282) were foot and ankle specialists. Some 58% (163/282) agreed that a pilon fracture is primarily a soft tissue injury, 81% (228/282) that pilon fractures occur though high-energy transfer, 81% (228/282) that pilon fractures are sustained through an axial compression mechanism and 93% (265/282) that they are a potentially limb-threatening injury. Overall, 83% (234/282) agreed that in a length-unstable pilon fracture it is not possible to maintain the talus near anatomically under the tibial plafond without rigid fixation to control length - with 87% (246/282) agreeing that the acute first-line management should be a spanning external fixator. Opinions were that the time frame between diagnosis and intervention should be: less than 6h (63%; 154/246), 6-12h (31%; 77/246) and 12-24h (6%; 15/246).
Conclusion: Consensus supports defining a pilon fracture as a potentially limb-threatening high-energy axial compression injury, and a spanning external fixator as the first-line management of a length-unstable injury less than 12h from diagnosis.
Keywords: Definition; Fracture; Management; Pilon.