Rate of Refracture After Removal of Hardware in Pediatric Femur Fractures

J Pediatr Orthop. 2023 Sep 1;43(8):e674-e679. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002454. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

Abstract

Purpose: Both flexible intramedullary nails (FINs) and plate osteosynthesis are commonly used for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study is to determine the refracture rate after hardware removal in pediatric femur fractures.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that utilized the Pediatric Health Information System database to determine the number of pediatric patients ages 4 to 10 who underwent surgical fixation of a femur fracture and subsequent hardware removal between the years 2015 and 2019. All patients had a minimum of a 2-year follow-up to assess for refracture. Patients with metabolic bone disease, neuromuscular conditions, bone fragility disorders, nutritional deficiencies, and pathologic fractures were excluded.

Results: Of the total, 2805 pediatric patients with 2881 femoral shaft fractures who underwent FIN (48.4%), plate fixation (36.1%), splinting/casting (14.9%), or external fixation (0.6%) were included. The mean age of patients with index fracture was 7.2 years (SD, 2.1) and 69% were males. Eight hundred eighty patients (60%) in the FIN group had their hardware removed compared with 693 patients (68%) in the plate fixation group ( P = 0.07), at an average of 287 ± 191 days versus 320 ± 203 days ( P = 0.03). Refracture occurred in 13 patients (1.5%) who had their hardware retained and in 21 patients (1.4%) who had their hardware removed ( P = 0.732). Among 65% of patients who underwent hardware removal, refracture occurred in 7 patients with FIN (0.8%) and 14 patients with plate fixation (2.2%) ( P = 0.04). Refracture occurred within 365 days from hardware removal in 1 patient with FIN (0.1%) and 7 patients with plate fixation (1%) ( P = 0.01). In logistic regression, patients with FIN fixation had lower odds of refracture after hardware removal compared with plate fixation (adjusted odds ratio: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.15-0.97). Age and payor status did not reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: The rate of refracture after hardware removal for pediatric patients with a femoral shaft fracture was similar between patients with hardware retained and removal. However, patients with FIN had a lower rate of refracture AFTER hardware removal compared with plate fixation. This information can be helpful for advising families regarding the risks of refracture after hardware removal.

Level of evidence: Level IV-retrospective cohort study.

MeSH terms

  • Bone Diseases*
  • Child
  • Female
  • Femoral Fractures* / surgery
  • Femur
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / adverse effects
  • Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary* / adverse effects
  • Fractures, Spontaneous*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome