Background: Most women in the face of stressful situations such as risk of a cancer diagnosis (abnormal Papanicolaou smear results) need guidance to choose the appropriate method to follow the diagnosis process, but few studies have identified appropriate interventions to support these women.
Objective: To determine the effect of decision aid on anxiety and satisfaction with decisions (SWD) regarding the type of follow-up method after receiving an abnormal Papanicolaou smear result.
Methods: This interventional study was conducted on women referred to the oncology clinic in Tabriz, Iran. Women were assigned to the intervention (n = 27) and control groups (n = 27) in a ratio of 1:1 using blocked randomization. The intervention group received a decision aid booklet. Participants in both groups completed questionnaires assessing demographic and obstetric characteristics, anxiety, SWD, and shared decision-making before and after the intervention.
Results: The mean score for SWD in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group after the intervention (median, 6.43 with 95% confidence interval of 3.11-7.76; P = .03). There was no significant difference between groups in the mean score of anxiety after intervention (median, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, -0.5 to 2.70; P = .19).
Conclusion: A decision aid can increase SWD among women with abnormal results in their cervical cancer screening.
Implications for practice: It is recommended that healthcare providers use decision aid tools to support and guide patients.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.