Improvement of predictive accuracies of functional outcomes after subacute stroke inpatient rehabilitation by machine learning models

PLoS One. 2023 May 26;18(5):e0286269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286269. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Objectives: Stepwise linear regression (SLR) is the most common approach to predicting activities of daily living at discharge with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in stroke patients, but noisy nonlinear clinical data decrease the predictive accuracies of SLR. Machine learning is gaining attention in the medical field for such nonlinear data. Previous studies reported that machine learning models, regression tree (RT), ensemble learning (EL), artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector regression (SVR), and Gaussian process regression (GPR), are robust to such data and increase predictive accuracies. This study aimed to compare the predictive accuracies of SLR and these machine learning models for FIM scores in stroke patients.

Methods: Subacute stroke patients (N = 1,046) who underwent inpatient rehabilitation participated in this study. Only patients' background characteristics and FIM scores at admission were used to build each predictive model of SLR, RT, EL, ANN, SVR, and GPR with 10-fold cross-validation. The coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) values were compared between the actual and predicted discharge FIM scores and FIM gain.

Results: Machine learning models (R2 of RT = 0.75, EL = 0.78, ANN = 0.81, SVR = 0.80, GPR = 0.81) outperformed SLR (0.70) to predict discharge FIM motor scores. The predictive accuracies of machine learning methods for FIM total gain (R2 of RT = 0.48, EL = 0.51, ANN = 0.50, SVR = 0.51, GPR = 0.54) were also better than of SLR (0.22).

Conclusions: This study suggested that the machine learning models outperformed SLR for predicting FIM prognosis. The machine learning models used only patients' background characteristics and FIM scores at admission and more accurately predicted FIM gain than previous studies. ANN, SVR, and GPR outperformed RT and EL. GPR could have the best predictive accuracy for FIM prognosis.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Humans
  • Inpatients
  • Machine Learning
  • Recovery of Function
  • Stroke Rehabilitation*
  • Stroke* / therapy
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding

The present research was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development(AMED) under Grant Number JP19he2302006 and JP22he230206h to MK, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science(JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number JP21H04911 to MK and JP22K21225 to YM, and Francebed Medical Home Care Research Subsidy Foundation to YM. Include this sentence at the end of your statement: The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript AMED: https://www.amed.go.jp/en/index.html JSPS: https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/index.html Francebed Medical Home Care Research Subsidy Foundation: https://www.fbm-zaidan.or.jp/.