Non-Lethal Dose-Response Models Replace Lethal Bioassays for Predicting the Hazard of Para-Aminopropiophenone to Australian Wildlife

Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 29;13(3):472. doi: 10.3390/ani13030472.

Abstract

Para-aminopropiophenone (PAPP) is a potent methaemoglobin (MetHb) forming agent used for the lethal control of exotic carnivores and mustelids. To assess the sensitivity of Australian wildlife to PAPP we developed an in vivo assay that did not use death as an endpoint. Sub-lethal dose-response data were modelled to predict PAPP doses required to achieve an endpoint set at 80% MetHb (MetHb80). The comparative sensitivity of non-target mammals referenced to this endpoint was found to be highly variable, with southern brown bandicoots (Isoodon obesulus) the most sensitive species (MetHb80 = 6.3 mg kg-1) and bush rats (Rattus fuscipes) the most tolerant (MetHb80 = 1035 mg kg-1). Published LD50 estimates were highly correlated with PAPP doses modelled to achieve the MetHb80 endpoint (r2 = 0.99, p < 0.001). Most dose-response data for native mammals were collected in the field or in semi-natural enclosures, permitting PAPP and placebo dosed animals to be fitted with tracking transmitters and transponders and released at their point of capture. A protracted morbidity and mortality was observed only in Australian ravens (Corvus coronoides). The combination of sub-lethal dose-response assay and survival data collected in the field provided more relevant information about the actual hazard of pest control agents to non-target wildlife species than laboratory-based lethal-dose bioassays. We discuss the need to replace lethal-dose data with biologically meaningful insights able to define a continuum of toxicological hazards that better serve the needs of conservation and veterinary scientists and wildlife managers.

Keywords: 3Rs; LD50; MetHb; PAPP; animal welfare; lethal-dose bioassay; methaemoglobin; non-lethal assay; para-aminopropiophenone; replacement.

Grants and funding

This work built upon preliminary IP funded and developed by Nocturnal Wildlife Research Pty Ltd. All research described in this paper was funded by Australian Wool Innovation Pty Ltd. via the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre. Further analysis and publication was supported by the Department of Conservation (New Zealand) Predator Free 2050 Tools to Market Programme under contract (reference number: 3054988; contract report: LC4147) and a research programme grant (2223-28-009 A) provided by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment as part of a research contract with Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research. The APC was funded by Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research.