Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial

Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2176201. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2176201.

Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of smartphone ophthalmoscope (SO) in teaching ophthalmoscopy, compared with direct ophthalmoscope (DO). In this cross-over study, 45 final-year medical students attending sessions at a single institution were randomly allocated to two groups (A and B). Both groups attended two training sessions. In the first session, Group A students were taught ophthalmoscopy using DO and Group B students using SO. In the second session, the training sessions were crossed over. A series of eye models with 10 letters placed on the inner surface were designed to assess the students' skill on ophthalmoscopy. Students performed ophthalmoscopy on the eye models, recorded their findings, and completed a questionnaire of feedback on DO and SO. The main outcome measure was the score of ophthalmoscopy, assessed by the student correctly recording each letter (score 1 for each letter). For Group A, the mean score of ophthalmoscopy on the eye model using DO and SO was 3.9±2.4 and 8.2±2.2, respectively. For Group B, the mean score of ophthalmoscopy on the eye model using SO and DO 8.7±1.8 and 5.7±3.5 . Students scored significantly higher in ophthalmoscopy when using SO than DO (P<0.001). They expressed better visualization of the fundus using SO than DO (4.49±0.65 vs 4.13±0.81, P=0.004). Students' performance of ophthalmoscopy was better when SO was used compared with DO. The use of SO as an adjunctive tool is recommended to improve the effectiveness of teaching ophthalmoscopy.

Keywords: Medical education; direct ophthalmoscope; eye model; ophthalmoscopy; smartphone ophthalmoscope.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Humans
  • Ophthalmology* / education
  • Ophthalmoscopes
  • Ophthalmoscopy
  • Smartphone
  • Students, Medical*
  • Teaching

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Intramural Grant of Joint Shantou International Eye Center under Grant 20-042, the Postgraduate Education Innovation Project of Guangdong Province under Grant 2022SQXX017, and the Key Disciplinary Project of Clinical Medicine under the Guangdong High-level University Development Program under Grant 002-18119101. The funding body did not play any role in study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data and manuscript preparation. Special Fund for Science and Technology of Guangdong Province under Grant 210701206902460; Special Fund for Science and Technology of Guangdong Province under Grant 2019ST024.Totally 5 fundings, and the sorting doesn't matter.