An Investigation of 2D Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with Compressed Sensing (CS)

Skeletal Radiol. 2022 Jun;51(6):1273-1283. doi: 10.1007/s00256-021-03954-x. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of compressed sensing MRI (CS-MRI) in the application of 2D spinal imaging and compare its performance with conventional MR imaging (non-CS-MRI).

Methods: The CS imaging protocol was optimized on 5 volunteers. Non-CS-MRI and CS-MRI of 2D sagittal T1 weighted imaging (WI), Sag T2WI, and axial T2WI were performed for 71 patients (22 cervical, 8 thoracic, 41 lumbar MRI). Paired t tests were conducted to compare the total scan time. Three radiologists assessed image quality and lesion diagnosis independently. A Kendall W test was performed to assess interobserver agreement of the image quality scores and lesion diagnosis between readers. A nonparametric test (Wilcoxon test) was performed to compare the image quality. For lesion diagnosis, the interobserver and interstudy agreements were evaluated by kappa analysis. Paired t tests were conducted for SNR and CNR comparison.

Results: The mean scan time for spine CS-MRI (4 min 28.7 s ± 34.6 s) was significantly shorter than that with non-CS-MRI (7 min 21.3 s ± 38.7 s, t = - 47.464, P < 0.0001). CS-MRI achieved higher SNR and CNR than Non-CS-MRI in image quality assessment. Interobserver agreements of lesion diagnosis were excellent between non-CS-MRI and CS-MRI (kappa value from 0.913 to 1.000, P < 0.001). Interstudy agreements of lesion assessments were also excellent (kappa value = 1.000, with P < 0.001).

Conclusion: CS-MRI spine imaging can significantly reduce the scan time, while maintaining comparable imaging quality to non-CS-MRI.

Keywords: Compressed sensing; Image quality; Lesion assessment; Spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional* / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / methods
  • Pressure
  • Spine / diagnostic imaging