Impact of Income Inequality on Urban Air Quality: A Game Theoretical and Empirical Study in China

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 13;18(16):8546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168546.

Abstract

Income inequality and environmental pollution are of great concern in China. It is important to better understand whether the narrowing of income inequality and environmental improvement contradict each other. The study aims to investigate the linkage between income inequality and environmental pollution. To illustrate the interplay between different income groups on environmental issues, we apply a mixed-strategy game. Based on the game-theoretic analytical result, the probability of residents supporting clean energy and environmental protection decreases as income inequality widens and increases as inequality narrows. This empirical study is based on the proportion of coal consumption and urban air pollution data from 113 key environmental protection cities and regions in China. The air quality data are from the National Environmental Air Quality Monitoring Network published in the China Statistical Yearbook from 2014-2018. Convincing results show that regions with higher income inequality suffer severe smog and related pollution and that economies with narrow income disparity experience significant improvements in smog and pollution control, with the expansion of the proportion of clean energy use. The results also provide no evidence of the impact of per capita income on pollution. We studied the relationship between individuals of different wealth levels within an economy, within a repeated-game setting. The finding suggests that the distribution of growth impacts pollution. Imposing higher taxes on air polluters while transferring the revenue to the lower-income group is suggested.

Keywords: air pollution; environmental awareness; income inequality; mixed-strategy games.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Air Pollution* / analysis
  • China
  • Environmental Pollution
  • Humans
  • Income
  • Socioeconomic Factors