Optimization of SPECT/CT imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative 99mTc SPECT

Dennis Kupitz; Heiko Wissel; Jan Wuestemann; Stephanie Bluemel; Maciej Pech; Holger Amthauer; Michael C Kreissl; Oliver S Grosser

doi:10.1186/s40658-021-00405-3

Optimization of SPECT/CT imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative ^99mTc SPECT

EJNMMI Phys. 2021 Jul 30;8(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00405-3.

Authors

Dennis Kupitz¹, Heiko Wissel², Jan Wuestemann², Stephanie Bluemel³, Maciej Pech^{2

4}, Holger Amthauer³, Michael C Kreissl^{2

4}, Oliver S Grosser^{2

4}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. dennis.kupitz@med.ovgu.de.
² Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
³ Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
⁴ Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

Abstract

Background: The introduction of hybrid SPECT/CT devices enables quantitative imaging in SPECT, providing a methodological setup for quantitation using SPECT tracers comparable to PET/CT. We evaluated a specific quantitative reconstruction algorithm for SPECT data using a ^99mTc-filled NEMA phantom. Quantitative and qualitative image parameters were evaluated for different parametrizations of the acquisition and reconstruction protocol to identify an optimized quantitative protocol.

Results: The reconstructed activity concentration (AC_rec) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of all examined protocols (n = 16) were significantly affected by the parametrization of the weighting factor k used in scatter correction, the total number of iterations and the sphere volume (all, p < 0.0001). The two examined SPECT acquisition protocols (with 60 or 120 projections) had a minor impact on the AC_rec and no significant impact on the SNR. In comparison to the known AC, the use of default scatter correction (k = 0.47) or object-specific scatter correction (k = 0.18) resulted in an underestimation of AC_rec in the largest sphere volume (26.5 ml) by - 13.9 kBq/ml (- 16.3%) and - 7.1 kBq/ml (- 8.4%), respectively. An increase in total iterations leads to an increase in estimated AC and a decrease in SNR. The mean difference between AC_rec and known AC decreased with an increasing number of total iterations (e.g., for 20 iterations (2 iterations/10 subsets) = - 14.6 kBq/ml (- 17.1%), 240 iterations (24i/10s) = - 8.0 kBq/ml (- 9.4%), p < 0.0001). In parallel, the mean SNR decreased significantly from 2i/10s to 24i/10s by 76% (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Quantitative SPECT imaging is feasible with the used reconstruction algorithm and hybrid SPECT/CT, and its consistent implementation in diagnostics may provide perspectives for quantification in routine clinical practice (e.g., assessment of bone metabolism). When combining quantitative analysis and diagnostic imaging, we recommend using two different reconstruction protocols with task-specific optimized setups (quantitative vs. qualitative reconstruction). Furthermore, individual scatter correction significantly improves both quantitative and qualitative results.

Keywords: Image reconstruction; Optimization; Quantitative SPECT; SPECT/CT; Scatter correction.