Anti-Ig antibodies can have two opposing effects on B-cell proliferation, resulting either in stimulation or inhibition. We have examined the proliferative response of 30 B-cell tumours to anti-Ig in the presence and absence of B-cell growth factor. Three reaction patterns were observed. In 12 cases a dose-dependent synergism between anti-Ig and B-cell growth factor was present in the induction of proliferation, in ten cases anti-Ig did not induce any response, and in eight cases anti-Ig suppressed the B-cell growth factor (BCGF)-induced proliferation. Similar responses to anti-Ig were found in the absence of BCGF. When these B-cell tumours were typed for expression of Ig isotypes, HLA class II antigens, several B-cell markers, activation markers, complement receptors, Fc receptors, cell size, and cell cycle phase, no correlation could be found with the proliferative response of these tumour B cells to anti-Ig. T cells or T-cell factors were not involved, because T-cell depletion did not change the tumour B-cell proliferative response to incubation with anti-Ig. The observed inhibition of proliferation did not correlate with the expression of Fc receptors, indicating the involvement of suppressor mechanisms other than the cross-linking of Fc receptors with surface immunoglobulins. Tumour B cells, for which monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies (MoAb anti-id) were available, responded to MoAb anti-id in the same way as they did to anti-Ig. In view of the treatment of B-cell malignancies with MoAb anti-id, the question of whether these responses in vitro correlate with in vivo clinical outcome of anti-id therapy is of interest. So far our data show that the proliferative response of B-cell tumours to anti-Ig or MoAb anti-id is heterogeneous and cannot be linked to phenotype, is T cell-independent, and is most likely an intrinsic property of the malignant cell.