Laparoscopic Ultra Low Anterior Resection: Single Center, 6-Year Study

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Mar;30(3):284-291. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0652. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

Abstract

Background: This study represents a prospective analysis of a series of laparoscopic ultra low anterior resection (ULAR) done at a laparoscopic surgical center to assess the surgical outcome, oncological efficacy, and quality of life after surgery. Methods: Over a period of 6 years (2013-2018), 43 patients aged between 40 and 68 years, with very low rectal cancers (3-6 cm from the anal verge), within T3N1M0 stage, assessed by positron emission tomography-computed tomography and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by laparoscopic ULAR and simultaneous diversion ileostomy. Results: The overall complication rate was low and there was an overall leak rate of 9.3% with a radiological leak (Grade A) in 3 of the 43 patients (7%), but only 1 (2.3%) patient required a local lavage and a resuturing for secondary hemorrhage. Recurrence was seen in 2/43 (4.7%), one of whom had a conversion to abdominoperineal resection. The other had distant metastasis and refused further treatment. The functional outcome is assessed in 41 (95.3%) patients by low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score and a reasonable quality of life with major LARS was seen in only 7.3% of the patients at a follow-up ranging from 1 to 6 years. Conclusion: The nCRT followed by laparoscopic ULAR is a feasible option for operable very low rectal cancers and is associated with minimal postoperative events, a low local recurrence and less incidence of LARS.

Keywords: APR; LARS; LARS score; nCRT; very low rectal cancer.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anastomotic Leak / epidemiology
  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Fecal Incontinence / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Flatulence / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Ileostomy / methods*
  • Laparoscopy / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
  • Proctectomy / methods*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life
  • Rectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Syndrome