Office-based vs. operating room-performed laryngopharyngeal surgery: a review of cost differences

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;276(11):2963-2973. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05617-z. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

Abstract

Purpose: Office-based transnasal flexible endoscopic surgery under topical anesthesia has recently been developed as an alternative for transoral laryngopharyngeal surgery under general anesthesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between the two surgical settings.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting on costs of laryngopharyngeal procedures that could either be performed in the office or operating room (i.e., laser surgery, biopsies, vocal fold injection, or hypopharyngeal or esophageal dilation). Quality assessment of the included references was performed.

Results: Of 2953 identified studies, 13 were included. Quality assessment revealed that methodology differed significantly among the included studies. All studies reported lower costs for procedures performed in the office compared to those performed in the operating room. The variation within reported hospital and physician charges was substantial.

Conclusion: Office-based laryngopharyngeal procedures under topical anesthesia result in lower costs compared to similar procedures performed under general anesthesia.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Costs; Larynx surgery; Office-based; Operating room; Pharynx surgery; Topical anesthesia.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Ambulatory Surgical Procedures / economics*
  • Anesthesia, General / economics
  • Anesthesia, Local / economics
  • Health Care Costs / statistics & numerical data*
  • Hospitalization / economics*
  • Humans
  • Larynx / surgery*
  • Netherlands
  • Operating Rooms / economics*
  • Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures / economics*
  • Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Pharynx / surgery*
  • United States