Non-Cross-Linked Versus Cross-Linked Collagen Membrane In Maxillary Sinus Perforation Repair: A Comparative Histologic Study In A Rat Model

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 January/February;35(1):91–99. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7600. Epub 2019 Jun 1.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare and evaluate maxillary sinus perforation repair, bone regeneration, and membrane degradation with cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen membranes in rat sinuses at 2, 4, and 10 weeks, respectively.

Materials and methods: Fifty-one Sprague-Dawley rat models were included in the study. Bilateral maxillary sinus perforations were made with a straight bur. In the control site, cross-linked collagen membrane (Ossix Plus) was placed, and in the test site, non-cross-linked collagen membrane was used (Pro-Tiss). Euthanasia was carried out under carbon dioxide asphyxia where 17 rats were sacrificed at weeks 2, 4, and 10. Histologic evaluation of the specimens was subsequently done.

Results: At 2 (P = .001), 4 (P = .031), and 10 (P = .024) weeks, there was a significant regeneration of maxillary sinus lining in sites treated with non-cross-linked collagen membrane over the cross-linked collagen membrane. No significant differences were observed in measures of bone regeneration (P = .92; 10 weeks) and membrane degradation (P = .06; 4 weeks) at the end of the study period between the two groups.

Conclusion: The non-cross-linked collagen membrane appears to be more beneficial in maxillary sinus repair. However, they do not seem to confer additional benefits in bone regeneration or membrane degradation over cross-linked collagen membranes.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Collagen*
  • Maxilla
  • Maxillary Sinus* / injuries
  • Maxillary Sinus* / surgery
  • Membranes, Artificial*
  • Rats
  • Rats, Sprague-Dawley

Substances

  • Membranes, Artificial
  • Collagen