From clinical assistant to clinical associate professor: Examination of a sample of promotion guidelines

Introduction: As accreditation standards for doctor of pharmacy programs have placed a greater emphasis on practice experiences, programs have a need for more clinical faculty. While clinical faculty are expected to achieve success in teaching, scholarly activity, and service, they tend to hold lower academic ranks and take more time to achieve promotion. This may be especially true when promotion guidelines lack clarity.

Methods: Guidelines for promotion of clinical faculty from assistant to associate rank for 10, research-intensive pharmacy programs were reviewed for predetermined factors in the areas of teaching, scholarly activity, and service using the following scale: required, desired, considered, not considered, or not specified. Some factors reviewed included: classroom teaching hours, number of clerkship students, types of scholarly activity considered, grantsmanship, and patient care services.

Results: There is significant variation in criteria utilized when considering promotion of clinical faculty from assistant to associate rank; few programs provide quantifiable requirements. All programs expect clinical faculty to participate in teaching. Only one program quantifies the amount of teaching expected. One program does not describe types of scholarly activity considered for promotion. No programs expect salary support from grants for clinical faculty. All programs consider direct patient care activities.

Conclusions: A wide variety of criteria are considered when evaluating a clinical faculty member for promotion to the rank of associate professor. Clearly defined promotion criteria may help faculty direct their efforts toward activities that are recognized to ensure timely promotion.