Invasion strategies in round goby (Neogobius melanostomus): Is bigger really better?

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0190777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190777. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Few studies have systematically investigated mid- or long-term temporal changes of biological characteristics in invasive alien species considering the different phases of an invasion. We studied the invasion performance of one of the most invasive species worldwide, the round goby Neogobius melanostomus, from total absence over first occurrence until establishment from 2010 to 2015 in the upper Danube River. After an upstream movement of the invasion front of about 30 river km within four years, the pattern that round goby pioneering populations significantly differ from longer established ones has been confirmed: Pioneering populations at the invasion front comprised more females than males, and adult specimens with a larger body size compared to those at longer inhabited areas. On the population-level, the proportion of juveniles increased with time since invasion. The results of this study provide support for the previously postulated ´bigger is better´ and ´individual trait utility´ hypotheses explaining invasion success in round goby. Pioneering invaders with their greater exploratory behavior, highly adaptive phenotypic plasticity and increased competitive ability seem to act as prime emperors of new habitats, strongly following and benefiting from man-made river-bank structures.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Animals
  • Body Size
  • Europe
  • Exploratory Behavior
  • Female
  • Introduced Species*
  • Male
  • Perciformes* / anatomy & histology
  • Phenotype
  • Population Dynamics
  • Rivers*
  • Sex Factors

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.mc8v5

Grants and funding

The present study was financially supported by the German Research Council DFG GE2169/1-1 (AOBJ: 569812) and DFG SCHL567/5-1. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. During part of the study (in 2015), ´Wasserwirtschaftsamt Regensburg´ provided support in the form of salaries for one author [JB], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This does therefore not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the 'author contributions' section.