-
- Comment in:
-
Lancet. 2004 Jan 10;363(9403):164; author reply 164-5.
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.
PMID: 2868172 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
Cited by over 100 PubMed Central articles
-
EMPLOYING TOPOGRAPHICAL HEIGHT MAP IN COLONIC POLYP MEASUREMENT AND FALSE POSITIVE REDUCTION.
Yao J, Li J, Summers RM.
Pattern Recognit. 2009; 42(6):1029-1040.
[Pattern Recognit. 2009]
-
Reproducibility and repeatability of measuring the electrical impedance of the pregnant human cervix-the effect of probe size and applied pressure.
Jokhi RP, Ghule VV, Brown BH, Anumba DO.
Biomed Eng Online. 2009 Jun 17; 8:10. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
[Biomed Eng Online. 2009]
-
Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular function.
Cosyns B, Haberman D, Droogmans S, Warzée S, Mahieu P, Laurent E, Moonen M, Hernot S, Lancellotti P.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2009 Jun 16; 7:27. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
[Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2009]
- » See all...