Assessing the suitability of medial sural artery perforator flaps in tongue reconstruction - An outcome study

PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171570. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Introduction: Oncological resection of the tongue can be reconstructed using a multitude of free flaps. The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap has been well described in the literature in terms of its anatomy and harvest. However, functional outcome studies of post-reconstruction tongue defects using the MSAP flap have not been reported. This study represents the largest outcome study of patients with tongue reconstructions using MSAP flaps and a comprehensive review of its use.

Materials and methods: From December of 2010 to October of 2015, 579 patients with subtotal glossectomy and free flap reconstructions in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. 27 patients were reconstructed with MSAP flap. The pre- and intra-operative factors, as well as flap-related factors were analyzed. Post-operative complications and functional outcomes were evaluated. Donor site assessment were also conducted.

Results: A 96.3% flap survival rate was found with an average total operating time of 6 hours and 18 minutes. 84.6% of patients had primary closure of the donor site with and the remaining either had skin grafts or delayed closure. Donor site closure can be achieved primarily with no functional deficit. Speech intelligibility remained for most patients. 100% of patients resumed normal oral feeding.

Conclusion: The MSAP flap is a small to medium sized flap most suited for subtotal glossectomy defects where optimal outcomes can be achieved in terms of speech clarity and restoration of oral intake.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Arteries / surgery
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / surgery*
  • Female
  • Glossectomy / adverse effects*
  • Glossectomy / instrumentation
  • Glossectomy / methods
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Perforator Flap / adverse effects*
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / adverse effects*
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / instrumentation
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods
  • Postoperative Complications*
  • Tongue / blood supply
  • Tongue / surgery
  • Tongue Neoplasms / surgery*

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.