Radiation Exposure from Diagnostic Imaging in a Cohort of Pediatric Transplant Recipients

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0167922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167922. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Recipients of solid organ transplants (SOT) have extensive diagnostic imaging (DI). The purpose of this study was to quantify this exposure. Children from northern Alberta with SOTs at Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta January 1, 2006, to July 31, 2012, were included. Effective doses of radiation were estimated using published norms for DI performed post-transplant up to October 16, 2014. The 54 eligible children had 6215 DI studies (5628 plain films, 293 computerized tomography (CT) scans, 149 positron emission topography (PET) -CT scans, 47 nuclear medicine scans and 98 cardiac catheterizations). Children less than 5 years of age underwent more DI studies than did older children (median (IQR) 140 (66-210) vs 49 (19-105), p = 0.010). Children with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (N = 8) had more CT scans (median (IQR) 13 (5.5-36) vs 1 (0-5), p<0.001) and PET-CT scans (median (IQR) 3.5 (1.5-8) vs 0 (0-0), p<0.001) than did other children. The estimated cumulative effective dose attributed to DI studies post-transplant was median (range) 78 (4.1-400) millisievert (mSv), and 19 of 54 children (35%; 95% confidence interval 24-49%) had a dose >100 mSv. In conclusion, a significant proportion of pediatric transplant recipients have sufficient radiation exposure post-transplant for DI to be at potential risk for radiation-induced malignancies.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Age Factors
  • Allografts
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation*
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Lymphoproliferative Disorders* / diagnostic imaging
  • Lymphoproliferative Disorders* / therapy
  • Male
  • Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced / epidemiology*
  • Positron-Emission Tomography / adverse effects*
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / adverse effects*

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.