Experiences of Conflict Zone-Related Ballistic Renal Injury

Indian J Surg. 2016 Aug;78(4):299-303. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1380-y. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

Abstract

To analyze our approaches and experiences in patients with renal injuries accompanying penetrating abdominal injuries admitted to the hospital due to high kinetic energy weapons. Patients including renal injuries associated with penetrating abdominal injuries due to gunshot wounds and fragments of shell treated at our institution between February 2002 and May 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Total 21 patients were included in this study, 20 of whom (86.2 %) were male and 1 (13.8 %) female. Renal injury was scaled in 2 patients as grade 1, 4 patients as grade 2, 4 patients as grade 3, 8 patients as grade 4, and 3 patients as grade 5. While conservative treatment was applied to patients with grade 1 and 2 injuries, 2 patients with grade 3 injury underwent renal repair and the other 13 patients underwent nephrectomy. The amount of blood transfused in all cases was determined to be mean 8.28 (6-16) units for red blood cells (ES) and 9 (6-17) units for fresh frozen plasma. When patients were assessed according to the Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI) scores, the median score and average PATI score were 35 and 37.6 (10-70), respectively. A physical examination along with a quick assessment of vital signs should be made, and unnecessary and time-consuming investigations such as abdominal tomography and angiographic intervention should be avoided. Conservative and organ preservation should be considered absolutely for appropriately selected patients, namely in stable patients in whom kinetic energy transfer is less and who have bullet path away from midline. However, the majority of these patients are considered to be hemodynamically unstable condition, possible complications of the procedure to be applied, and selection of patients should be carefully evaluated.

Keywords: High kinetic energy; Kidney; Penetrating injury; Trauma.