Cost-Effectiveness of Antibody-Based Induction Therapy in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United States

Transplantation. 2017 Jun;101(6):1234-1241. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001310.

Abstract

Background: Induction therapy in deceased donor kidney transplantation is costly, with wide discrepancy in utilization and a limited evidence base, particularly regarding cost-effectiveness.

Methods: We linked the United States Renal Data System data set to Medicare claims to estimate cumulative costs, graft survival, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER - cost per additional year of graft survival) within 3 years of transplantation in 19 450 deceased donor kidney transplantation recipients with Medicare as primary payer from 2000 to 2008. We divided the study cohort into high-risk (age > 60 years, panel-reactive antibody > 20%, African American race, Kidney Donor Profile Index > 50%, cold ischemia time > 24 hours) and low-risk (not having any risk factors, comprising approximately 15% of the cohort). After the elimination of dominated options, we estimated expected ICER among induction categories: no-induction, alemtuzumab, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG), and interleukin-2 receptor-antagonist.

Results: No-induction was the least effective and most costly option in both risk groups. Depletional antibodies (r-ATG and alemtuzumab) were more cost-effective across all willingness-to-pay thresholds in the low-risk group. For the high-risk group and its subcategories, the ICER was very sensitive to the graft survival; overall both depletional antibodies were more cost-effective, mainly for higher willingness to pay threshold (US $100 000 and US $150 000). Rabbit ATG appears to achieve excellent cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (80% of the recipients) in both risk groups at US $50 000 threshold (except age > 60 years). In addition, only r-ATG was associated with graft survival benefit over no-induction category (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.99) in a multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Conclusions: Antibody-based induction appears to offer substantial advantages in both cost and outcome compared with no-induction. Overall, depletional induction (preferably r-ATG) appears to offer the greatest benefits.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Administrative Claims, Healthcare / economics
  • Alemtuzumab
  • Antibodies / adverse effects
  • Antibodies / economics*
  • Antibodies / therapeutic use*
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / economics
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / therapeutic use
  • Antilymphocyte Serum / economics
  • Antilymphocyte Serum / therapeutic use
  • Cause of Death
  • Cost Savings
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Databases, Factual
  • Drug Costs*
  • Female
  • Graft Rejection / economics*
  • Graft Rejection / immunology
  • Graft Rejection / prevention & control*
  • Graft Survival / drug effects
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / adverse effects
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / economics*
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Induction Chemotherapy / adverse effects
  • Induction Chemotherapy / economics*
  • Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit / immunology
  • Kidney Transplantation / adverse effects
  • Kidney Transplantation / economics*
  • Kidney Transplantation / methods
  • Male
  • Medicare / economics
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Economic
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors
  • Tissue Donors*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States

Substances

  • Antibodies
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Antilymphocyte Serum
  • IL2RA protein, human
  • Immunosuppressive Agents
  • Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit
  • Alemtuzumab
  • thymoglobulin