[Somatic treatments in psychiatry: A descriptive study of laboratory tests and systematic involvement in terms of overall care]

Background: Somatic suffering concerns mental health in many ways, but numerous psychiatrists are still reluctant to take an interest in somatic care due to a supposed lack of expertise and an alteration of the psychotherapeutic link, whilst in parallel numerous fellow physicians are quite apprehensive about treating patients with mental disorders.

Objectives: We have undertaken a targeted clinical audit regarding the somatic treatment of in-patients in a psychiatric unit to propose the implementation of measures of improvement.

Material and methods: Our study focused on the identification and treatment of abnormal liver function tests, a subject that has been overlooked in the literature, yet from clinical experience the results are often abnormal in psychiatric unit in-patients. We analysed retrospectively over a period of two years the medical records of psychiatric unit in-patients with abnormal results for at least one of the following hepatic markers: aspartate-aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and bilirubin.

Results: In total, 188 liver test results were abnormal, with an average of 1.7 per patient. The abnormal test results were in decreasing order: elevation in GGT (80 % of patients), elevation in transaminases (65.5 % for each), elevation in ALP (19.1 %) and elevation in bilirubin (7.27 %). Abnormal transaminase levels were lower than 10N, with a peak between 1N and 3N for ALT and a peak between 1N and 5N for AST. The elevation in GGT was between 1N and 34N, although 71.6 % of these values were below 5N. ALP was below 3N. The medical history was traced in 93.6 % of the records. A somatic clinical examination was only reported in 39 records (35.5 %) and was carried out by a hepato-gastroenterologist (HGE) in 30.8 % of cases, the establishment's emergency physician in 25.7 % of cases and the psychiatrists in 12.9 % of cases. Patients with abnormal liver function test results frequently underwent other biological and morphological examinations. A discharge letter was found in almost all cases. Abnormal liver function test results were indicated in less than 45 % of these discharge letters, whilst over half reported the establishment of a future treatment coordinated by the GP, in close collaboration with the gastroenterologist in at least half the cases.

Discussion: Our study was carried out in an open psychiatric unit in the heart of a general hospital that mainly receives patients suffering from thymus and anxiety disorders, addictive disorders, somatoform disorders, personality disorders and psycho-organic disorders. Patients suffering from schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders comprised less than 10 % of admissions. Our retrospective study of over 750 hospital admissions over a period of two years found only 62.93 % of patients underwent liver function tests, which proved to be pathological in nearly 30 % of cases. Following a well-defined anamnesis, just over a third of patients underwent a physical examination whilst in hospital, more often a while after admission and not in the psychiatric unit. The consultation of fellow hospital physicians was limited even if the gastroenterologist was called upon in 30 % of cases. It was sometimes the treatment pathway or the fortuitous presence of co-morbidities that enabled the anaesthetist or emergency physician to carry out this clinical examination. However, when this physical examination was scheduled, clinical hepatobiliary signs were discovered in 30 % of patients.

Conclusion: An accurate, formalised reference database detailing the principles of the somatic treatment of psychiatric unit in-patients should be established. Our results indicate the necessity of a referring physician in each psychiatric department.