Abstract
Bovine herpesviruses 1 and 5 (BoHV-1 and BoHV-5) are economically important pathogens, associated with a variety of clinical syndromes, including respiratory and genital disease, reproductive failure and meningoencephalitis. The standard serological assay to diagnose BoHV-1 and BoHV-5 infections is the virus neutralization test (VNT), a time consuming procedure that requires manipulation of infectious virus. In the present study a highly sensitive and specific single dilution indirect ELISA was developed using recombinant glycoprotein D from BoHV-5 as antigen (rgD5ELISA). Bovine serum samples (n = 450) were screened by VNT against BoHV-5a and by rgD5ELISA. Compared with the VNT, the rgD5ELISA demonstrated accuracy of 99.8%, with 100% sensitivity, 96.7% specificity and coefficient of agreement between the tests of 0.954. The rgD5ELISA described here shows excellent agreement with the VNT and is shown to be a simple, convenient, specific and highly sensitive virus-free assay for detection of serum antibodies to BoHV-5.
Publication types
-
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
MeSH terms
-
Animals
-
Antibodies, Viral / blood
-
Area Under Curve
-
Cattle
-
Cattle Diseases / diagnosis*
-
Cattle Diseases / virology
-
Dogs
-
Encephalitis, Viral / diagnosis*
-
Encephalitis, Viral / immunology
-
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / methods*
-
Geography
-
Herpesviridae Infections / diagnosis*
-
Herpesviridae Infections / immunology
-
Herpesvirus 5, Bovine
-
Madin Darby Canine Kidney Cells
-
Meningoencephalitis / diagnosis*
-
Meningoencephalitis / immunology
-
Neutralization Tests
-
Pichia
-
ROC Curve
-
Recombinant Proteins / chemistry
-
Reproducibility of Results
-
Sensitivity and Specificity
-
Viral Envelope Proteins / immunology
-
Viral Envelope Proteins / isolation & purification*
Substances
-
Antibodies, Viral
-
Recombinant Proteins
-
Viral Envelope Proteins
-
glycoprotein D, bovine herpesvirus 5
Grants and funding
This research was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (grants 478461/2004-6 and 140287/2010-8). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.