Very Preterm Infants Failing CPAP Show Signs of Fatigue Immediately after Birth

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 8;10(6):e0129592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129592. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the differences in breathing pattern and effort in infants at birth who failed or succeeded on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during the first 48 hours after birth.

Methods: Respiratory function recordings of 32 preterm infants were reviewed of which 15 infants with a gestational age of 28.6 (0.7) weeks failed CPAP and 17 infants with a GA of 30.1 (0.4) weeks did not fail CPAP. Frequency, duration and tidal volumes (VT) of expiratory holds (EHs), peak inspiratory flows, CPAP-level and FiO2-levels were analysed.

Results: EH incidence increased <6 minutes after birth and remained stable thereafter. EH peak inspiratory flows and VT were similar between CPAP-fail and CPAP-success infants. At 9-12 minutes, CPAP-fail infants more frequently used smaller VTs, 0-9 ml/kg and required higher peak inspiratory flows. However, CPAP-success infants often used large VTs (>9 ml/kg) with higher peak inspiratory flows than CPAP-fail infants (71.8 ± 15.8 vs. 15.5 ± 5.2 ml/kg.s, p <0.05). CPAP-fail infants required higher FiO2 (0.31 ± 0.03 vs. 0.21 ± 0.01), higher CPAP pressures (6.62 ± 0.3 vs. 5.67 ± 0.26 cmH2O) and more positive pressure-delivered breaths (45 ± 12 vs. 19 ± 9%) (p <0.05).

Conclusion: At 9-12 minutes after birth, CPAP-fail infants more commonly used lower VTs and required higher peak inspiratory flow rates while receiving greater respiratory support. VT was less variable and larger VT was infrequently used reflecting early signs of fatigue.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Continuous Positive Airway Pressure*
  • Fatigue / physiopathology*
  • Female
  • Gases / metabolism
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant, Premature / physiology*
  • Lung / metabolism
  • Male
  • Oxygen / metabolism
  • Parturition*
  • Respiration
  • Tidal Volume

Substances

  • Gases
  • Oxygen

Grants and funding

A.B. te Pas is recipient of a Veni-grant, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), part of the Innovational Research Incentives Scheme Veni-Vidi-Vici, projectnumber 91612027. J.J. van Vonderen is recipient of a Willem-Alexander Children’s Foundation scholarship. M.L. Siew was funded by the David Henderson-Smart Travel Scholarship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.