Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):843-55. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9580-6. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

Researcher Perspectives on Conflicts of Interest: A Qualitative Analysis of Views from Academia.

Author information

  • 1University of Oklahoma, 3100 Monitor, Suite 100, Norman, OK, 73072, USA, jensen.mecca@gmail.com.

Abstract

The increasing interconnectedness of academic research and external industry has left research vulnerable to conflicts of interest. These conflicts have the potential to undermine the integrity of scientific research as well as to threaten public trust in scientific findings. The present effort sought to identify themes in the perspectives of faculty researchers regarding conflicts of interest. Think-aloud interview responses were qualitatively analyzed in an effort to provide insights with regard to appropriate ways to address the threat of conflicts of interest in research. Themes in participant responses included disclosure of conflicts of interest, self-removal from situations where conflict exists, accommodation of conflict, denial of the existence of conflict, and recognition of complexity of situations involving conflicts of interest. Moral disengagement operations are suggested to explain the appearance of each identified theme. In addition, suggestions for best practices regarding addressing conflicts of interest given these themes in faculty perspectives are provided.

PMID:
25115563
[PubMed - in process]
PMCID:
PMC4326636
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk