Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Nurse Res. 2014 Jul;21(6):8-11. doi: 10.7748/nr.21.6.8.e1254.

What does originality in research mean? A student's perspective.

Author information

  • 1University of South Wales Cardiff, UK.

Abstract

AIM:

To provide a student's perspective of what it means to be original when undertaking a PhD.

BACKGROUND:

A review of the literature related to the concept of originality in doctoral research highlights the subjective nature of the concept in academia. Although there is much literature that explores the issues concerning examiners' views of originality, there is little on students' perspectives.

REVIEW METHODS:

A snowballing technique was used, where a recent article was read, and the references cited were then explored. Given the time constraints, the author recognises that the literature review was not as extensive as a systematic literature review.

DISCUSSION:

It is important for students to be clear about what is required to achieve a PhD. However, the vagaries associated with the formal assessment of the doctoral thesis and subsequent performance at viva can cause considerable uncertainty and anxiety for students.

CONCLUSION:

Originality in the PhD is a subjective concept and is not the only consideration for examiners. Of comparable importance is the assessment of the student's ability to demonstrate independence of thought and increasing maturity so they can become independent researchers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH/PRACTICE:

This article expresses a different perspective on what is meant when undertaking a PhD in terms of originality in the doctoral thesis. It is intended to help guide and reassure current and potential PhD students.

KEYWORDS:

PhD; Student perspectives; doctoral research; originality

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk