Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Neuroimaging. 2014 Jul 15. doi: 10.1111/jon.12140. [Epub ahead of print]

Relationship between Two Types of Coil Packing Densities Relative to Aneurysm Size.

Author information

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

Coil packing density (PD) can be calculated via a formula (PDF ) or software (PDS ). Two types of PD can be different from each other for same aneurysm. This study aimed to evaluate the interobserver agreement and relationships between the 2 types of PD relative to aneurysm size.

METHODS:

Consecutive 420 saccular aneurysms were treated with coiling. PD (PDF , [coil volume]/[volume calculated by formula] and PDS, [coil volume]/[volume measured by software]) was calculated and prospectively recorded. Interobserver agreement was evaluated between PDF and PDS . Additionally, the relationships between PDF and PDS relative to aneurysm size were subsequently analyzed.

RESULTS:

Interobserver agreement for PDF and PDS was excellent (Intraclass correlation coefficient, PDF ; 0.967 and PDS ; 0.998). The ratio of PDF and PDS was greater for smaller aneurysms and converged toward 1.0 as the maximum dimension (DM ) of aneurysm increased. Compared with PDS , PDF was overestimated by a mean of 28% for DM < 5 mm, by 17% for 5 mm ≤ DM < 10 mm, and by 9% for DM ≥ 10 mm (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Interobserver agreement for PDF and PDS was excellent. However, PDF was overestimated in smaller aneurysms and converged to PDS as aneurysm size increased.

Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Neuroimaging.

KEYWORDS:

Aneurysm; coiling; packing density

PMID:
25040135
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk