Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jul;134(1):172-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.059. Epub 2014 May 13.

Alternatives to commonly used pelvic reconstruction procedures in gynecologic oncology.

Author information

  • 1The Ohio State University, Department of Plastic Surgery, Columbus, OH 43212, USA. Electronic address: Albert.Chao@osumc.edu.
  • 2University Of Texas Health Science Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
  • 3The Ohio State University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The objective of this review is to discuss alternatives to commonly used methods of soft tissue reconstruction in patients with gynecologic malignancies, and in particular alternatives to skin grafts, local skin flaps, and rectus abdominis/gracilis flaps.

METHODS:

A review of the literature was performed on soft tissue reconstruction in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

RESULTS:

Soft tissue reconstruction is often necessary to achieve successful wound healing, minimize complications, and to restore anatomic form and function. Commonly used methods such as skin grafts, local skin flaps, and rectus abdominis/gracilis flaps are effective, but many scenarios exist where they may be suboptimal or unavailable for use. Situations faced by the gynecologic oncologist where this may be the case include patients in whom prior treatments and/or tumor involvement have affected the vascular supply and tissues of commonly used options, those with disease recurrence who have previously undergone tumor extirpation and reconstruction, and patients undergoing radical surgery where commonly used options alone are inadequate. Under these circumstances, there are several alternative options, and an understanding of the full spectrum of reconstructive techniques is essential.

CONCLUSIONS:

Many clinical scenarios exist where commonly used options for soft tissue reconstruction are suboptimal or unavailable. Current evidence supports use of alternative methods of reconstruction in these situations. However, further larger scale and comparative studies are needed to refine surgical decision-making.

Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Flap; Reconstruction

PMID:
24835912
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk