The right indicator for the job: different levels of rigor may be appropriate for the development of quality indicators. Comment on Stelfox and Straus

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;67(9):963-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

Authors

Kris Doggen¹, Astrid Lavens², Viviane Van Casteren²

Affiliations

¹ Scientific Institute of Public Health, Health Services Research Unit, Rue J. Wytsman 14, 1050 Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: kris.doggen@wiv-isp.be.
² Scientific Institute of Public Health, Health Services Research Unit, Rue J. Wytsman 14, 1050 Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

PMID: 24786596
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.001

No abstract available

Publication types

Letter
Comment

MeSH terms

Humans
Needs Assessment*
Quality Indicators, Health Care / organization & administration*
Quality Indicators, Health Care / standards*