Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
PLoS Genet. 2014 May 1;10(5):e1004290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004290. eCollection 2014.

Copy number variation is a fundamental aspect of the placental genome.

Author information

  • 1Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
  • 2Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Tallahassee Florida, United States of America.
  • 3Division of Bioinformatics, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Abstract

Discovery of lineage-specific somatic copy number variation (CNV) in mammals has led to debate over whether CNVs are mutations that propagate disease or whether they are a normal, and even essential, aspect of cell biology. We show that 1,000 N polyploid trophoblast giant cells (TGCs) of the mouse placenta contain 47 regions, totaling 138 Megabases, where genomic copies are underrepresented (UR). UR domains originate from a subset of late-replicating heterochromatic regions containing gene deserts and genes involved in cell adhesion and neurogenesis. While lineage-specific CNVs have been identified in mammalian cells, classically in the immune system where V(D)J recombination occurs, we demonstrate that CNVs form during gestation in the placenta by an underreplication mechanism, not by recombination nor deletion. Our results reveal that large scale CNVs are a normal feature of the mammalian placental genome, which are regulated systematically during embryogenesis and are propagated by a mechanism of underreplication.

PMID:
24785991
[PubMed - in process]
PMCID:
PMC4006706
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk