Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Jul;10(4):e247-54. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001275. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

Changes in the care of non-small-cell lung cancer after audit and feedback: the Florida initiative for quality cancer care.

Author information

  • 1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; Center for Cancer Care and Research at Watson Clinic, Lakeland; Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Sarasota; Spacecoast Cancer Center, Titusville; Ocala Oncology, Ocala; Coastal Oncology and Hematology, Stuart; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Cancer Center of Florida, Orlando; North Broward Medical Center, Deerfield Beach; Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Tallahassee; and University of Florida, Gainesville, FL tanvett@moffitt.org.
  • 2H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; Center for Cancer Care and Research at Watson Clinic, Lakeland; Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Sarasota; Spacecoast Cancer Center, Titusville; Ocala Oncology, Ocala; Coastal Oncology and Hematology, Stuart; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Cancer Center of Florida, Orlando; North Broward Medical Center, Deerfield Beach; Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Tallahassee; and University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Audit and feedback have been widely used to enhance the performance of various medical practices. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common diseases encountered in medical oncology practice. We investigated the use of audit and feedback to improve the care of NSCLC.

METHODS:

Medical records were reviewed for patients with NSCLC first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 (n = 518) and 2009 (n = 573) at 10 oncology practices participating in the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care. In 2008, feedback from 2006 audit results was provided to practices, which then independently undertook steps to improve their performance. Sixteen quality-of-care indicators (QCIs) were evaluated on both time points and were examined for changes in adherence over time.

RESULTS:

A statistically significant increase in adherence was observed for five of 16 QCIs. Adherence to brain staging using magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography scan for stage III NSCLC (57.8% in 2006 v 82.8% in 2009; P = .001), availability of chemotherapy flow sheet (89.2% v 97.0%; P < .001), documentation of performance status for stage III and IV disease (43.4% v 51.3%; P < .001), availability of pathology report for patients undergoing surgery (95.2% v 99.2%; P = .02), and availability of signed chemotherapy consent (69.5% v 76.3%; P = .04). There were no statistically significant decreases in adherence on any QCIs.

CONCLUSION:

Audit with feedback was associated with a modest but important improvement in the treatment of NSCLC. Whether these changes are durable will require long-term follow-up.

Copyright © 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

PMID:
24737876
[PubMed - in process]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk