Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Thromb Res. 2014 Jul;134(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.03.029. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

Frequent off-label use of fondaparinux in patients with suspected acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)--findings from the GerHIT multi-centre registry study.

Author information

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine/Haemostaseology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt/M., Germany. Electronic address: marc.schindewolf@kgu.de.
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine/Haemostaseology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt/M., Germany.
  • 3Department of Medicine III, Division of Angiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • 4Medical Department II, Municipal Hospital Dresden Friedrichstadt, Dresden, Germany.
  • 5Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Charité Hospital, Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • 6II. Medical Clinic, Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany.
  • 7Department of Haemostaseology and Transfusion Medicine, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
  • 8Institute of Experimental Haematology and Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • 9Department of Internal Medicine, Haemophilia Treatment Centre, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • 10Institute of Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, München, Germany.
  • 11GlaxoSmithKline, Biostatistics & Epidemiology, München, Germany.
  • 12GlaxoSmithKline, Cardiovascular and Antithrombotics, München, Germany.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

In life-threatening immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), treatment with an approved non-heparin anticoagulant is essential. However, off-label use with fondaparinux has been reported in the literature. The study aim was to collect data on "real-life" management of patients with suspected acute HIT regarding diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

In a national multi-centre registry study, patients with a 4T's HIT-probability score of ≥ 4 points and treatment with at least one dose of (A)rgatroban, (L)epirudin, (D)anaparoid, or (F)ondaparinux were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS:

Of 195 patients, the 4T's scores were 4/5/6/7/8 points in 46 (23.6%)/50 (25.6%)/74 (38.0%)/13 (6.7%)/7 (3.6%) patients, respectively. During heparin therapy, 47 (24.1%) thromboembolic events, 5 (2.6%) skin lesions, 1 (0.5%) amputation, 24 (12.3%) Hb-relevant bleedings, and 2 (1.0%) fatalities occurred. A functional heparin-induced platelet activation assay was performed in 96.9%, a platelet factor 4/heparin-dependent enzyme immunoassay in 89.2%, a particle gel immunoassay in 12.3%, and a serotonin-release assay in none of the patients. Argatroban was used in 16.4%, lepirudin in 2.1%, danaparoid in 23.6%, fondaparinux in 40.0% of the patients; the sequential therapy strata were: AF (5.6%), DA (5.6%), DF (2.6%), DL (2.1%), ADF (1.5%), and DFL (0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The current diagnostic laboratory strategy for suspected HIT is mostly (>96%) based on the recommended 2-step strategy (immunoassay plus functional assay). However, there is a wide fondaparinux off-label use (up to 50.3%) for suspected HIT, even in those patients with a high clinical pretest probability. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for HIT-treatment require further evaluation.

Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Argatroban; Danaparoid; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; Lepirudin

Comment in

PMID:
24703295
[PubMed - in process]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk